« yesterday | Main | Silas Marner, chapters 1-4 »

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

is this the real life?

(bonus points if you're humming a Queen song now.)

Yesterday my husband emailed me this story (go ahead and at least skim it and come back or this will make no sense a-tall to you), and asked if I thought it was an accurate snapshot of the way women think. I told him, as I am telling you now, that I wouldn't know about the women-in-the-bar scene, or what it's really like "out there" for single women my age, because I and all my (staggering array of) women friends are married and have been that way for a while. This is what it's like in women's BOOKS, I'll say that.

What really made my stomach clench up was this bit in the men's equivalent article (linked at the bottom of the women's one):


Q: How far will you guys go that first time you’re together?


Joe:
All the way.

Brendan: How far would I go, or how far would I go and have a relationship afterwards? Because if I get everything the first time we’re together, I probably won’t be calling her back.

Beecher: That’s horrible. But I will say that if she’s willing to hook up on the first date, it says something about her attitude.

Joe: For me, it wouldn’t matter. I’m not going to judge her based on whether she goes all the way, because, to tell the truth, I will if she will.

Beecher: It’s not a deal-breaker. If she makes me wait, so long as it’s not too long, that’s fine.

Q: How long is too long to wait to do the deed?
Beecher: Three dates.

Brendan: For someone I really liked, I’d wait months.

Joe: To tell you the truth, I haven’t had to wait any longer than three or four dates, so I don’t really know. But I’d have a very hard time waiting as long as Brendan.

These men are in their twenties. That means that, considering the way social mores trend downward, twenty years from now, when my daughter is in their age, it's going to be like that to the twentieth power, I would think. Or at least times twenty (observe my staggering mathematical acumen as I completely pull this theory out of the air). Or whatever. But it's going to be worse than this, I think we can all agree on that, yes? And those are going to be the men in the world who will be looking at my daughter as she walks down the street and goes about her business. Frankly it makes me want to pick out a few prospects who might be OK and then take out every other male who looks at her. Really, though, I'm going to try to save this article until she's old enough to discuss this topic, say eight or ten years, and point out to her that this is what average men of the world will think of her. They will think of her as someone who isn't worth waiting three dates to have sex with. Please God I hope there are some parents out there bringing up their sons to be different, and please God I hope that He will help us to bring up our children (both of them) to see the harm in this kind of lifestyle and avoid it like the plague.

Posted by Rachel on August 23, 2006 12:38 AM in motherhood | rants | serious stuff

Comments

First of all, those girls are air heads and the boys that will give them the time of day are air heads. Secondly, (in my experience) the only types of people that "get on" in that fashion are bar flies. Party people. The guys I respect (And granted, they are few and far between) wouldn't give a woman who puts out with the first guy she meets at a bar the time of day. Also, the girls I know wouldn't have s e x with a guy until he was seeing her exclusively and some even plan on waiting until marriage.

And what about diseases? After all that education about S T Ds you'd think people would have stopped having s e x by now.

As for sweet C, we can hope and pray that she will never put herself in a situation where she is exposed to people like that. In other words, tell her to stay out of bars and clubs ;-)

I have a good feeling you two won't have a problem with your kids where drugs and s e x and all that is concerned...I mean you have given them a healthy religious upbringing and you and T are in love and love your kids. It's a healthy, caring environment...Not one that usually spawns s l u t s and junkies ;-) Plus, neither of you party or do drugs or have s e x with strangers, so that cuts the odds by at least 30%

Posted by: jenn at August 22, 2006 10:32 PM

I'm so, so glad I'm married to a good man and never had to deal with all that bar-scene garbage! I agree with Jenn that the "bar types" are much more likely than others to behave in this way, though I also tend to think that things are going downhill in this department (as in many others).

As for C's prospects, I wouldn't worry too much. There are still some families (like yours) that raise both daughters *and* sons to think and act in an appropriate manner.

And if the guys in the article are the norm for "that type of guy", it shouldn't be too difficult (or take more than three or four dates!!) to sort out the bad apples.

Posted by: Michael at August 23, 2006 06:23 AM

Before the little guy was born, I was sort of hoping he was a boy, for exactly these reasons. It scares me, the stuff that girls will have to put up with. I have recently gotten my hands on several issues of *Seventeen* magazine (remember that?) and I am disgusted and appalled. First, at how these girls dress, and second, at the issues they are dealing with. What happened to the Prom Dress issue of the magazine? :(


I guess it is our job to raise better boys than these.

Also, you can tell T that I know of no such women either. :)

Posted by: mary at August 23, 2006 08:43 AM

First, yes, Queen is now stuck in my head.

Second, I am a single woman in my 20s, and do occasionally go to bars with other single women, and we have never talked about anything like that. We talk about work and knitting and books and family stuff. (And I make one good beer last the whole evening.)

Third, I know those people are supposed to be "average," but... if they were average, wouldn't we meet more of them? Hmm.

Posted by: Kat with a K at August 23, 2006 09:02 AM

Even when single, I was always more prone to go out to parties or bars to enjoy myself with friends, which is not only far more fun in itself but tends to mean that if you do meet someone he's a friend or at least acquaintance of a friend.

Still, that discussion didn't sound totally unrealistic for me ... for a bunch of women who were specifically going out to meet men and who were asked specific questions about meeting men. I'd guess when they're not talking on the record for an article on a specific subject, they talk about work and books and knitting too. And there certainly are people who go out specifically to meet men/women. They're the ones talking a little too loudly, pretending to have fun. And yeah, I'd say they're out there - but so are plenty of people who want to meet someone they can love for the rest of their lives. I have several single male friends who would make excellent and faithful husbands.

Note that even in that sample of three barhoppers above, you have one who's willing to wait "months" (and you can figure if he'll wiat months, he'll wait years, but may not want to say so in that environment). However, I don't think that redeems him; Brendan is setting a trap where if she sleeps with him he'll dump her, even though obviously he's exactly as promiscuous as she is. Joe may not be waiting as long as you'd like but at least he's not playing games and sitting in judgment based on a double standard.

Mostly, I think Mary nailed it in her comment: mothers of sons have a responsibility to riase their sons to the same standards they'd like to see used toward their daughters. My MIL doesn't have a daughter, but she did an excellent job nonetheless.

Posted by: dichroic at August 23, 2006 09:21 AM

Well, I work at a university, and I see these attitudes ALL THE TIME. I agree, Rachel, that it's becoming more prevalent and accepted among the younger peer groups to think and act this way. If they don't act this way in high school, they quickly learn to when they get to college.

Posted by: Kristen at August 23, 2006 10:45 AM

Post a comment




Remember This Information?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


[no preview till I work out a bug or two. Sorry.]